("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr)
Since the recent athletics fee increase referendum passed on March 22, I have been trying to process the results.
For readers who do not know, this spring, the UT-Tyler athletics program proposed a roughly $90 per semester increase to mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee. The proposal called for an incremental increase by $30 per semester over the next three years, until fee ultimately reached the $90 proposed increase in 2026. So in the end, the increase would raise students’ maximum semester payment from $270 to $330 by 2026. (It would also increase the semester minimum from $96 now to $132.) This was the proposal and students voted on it from March 20 to March 22.
However, my issue lately is not with the increase itself, but rather with how the referendum supposedly passed.
According to The Student Engagement Office, students passed the referendum (meaning, they approved the fee increase) by 50.34% to 46.96%. The referendum also had 937 turnout.
Yet, where I take issue—and what I cannot accept—is the language of the proposition officials used to measure student opinion. This language was so partial, and so in favor of the athletics program that I believe it fundamentally corrupted the election as a poll of student opinion.
It read,
"Nearly 300 student-athletes participate in intercollegiate athletics at UT Tyler on 18 teams. The UT Tyler Patriots compete in the NCAA Division II Lone Star Conference with the lowest student athletic fee in the conference. An increase in this fee will make other funds available for student engagement and support opportunities. Do you support the increase of the UT Tyler athletic fee to fund athletics, increase the value of your UT Tyler degree, and provide students with more engagement and support opportunities?"
This language’s design is to compel the reader to vote in favor of the athletics fee increase.
This language is unacceptable.
A referendum’s purpose, especially one over a fee increase, is to discern a population’s majority opinion. A referendum, therefore, is an opinion poll, not a sales call. It is a survey of student opinion, not a piece of campaign literature.
This language clearly violates the referendum’s official purpose and, consequently, corrupts it as a valid source of student sentiment.
The referendum student government conducted was not an opinion survey, but rather an expression of special interest and of the extent of its influence in the election.
Such biased and persuasive language should not have been on the ballot of what was supposed to be an impartial survey. Such behavior is below the acceptable standards of what a referendum ought to be.
Since the referendum was not an independent survey, then it is not a true representation of student opinion.
The referendum is invalid.
Students should reject the referendum’s results as a valid representation of student opinion and should call upon both the University and The UT System Board of Regents (the university’s governing board) to do the same. The ballot language corrupted the poll’s results. The referendum is invalid.
Dean of Students Contact - dos@uttyler.edu
UT-Tyler President Contact - kcalhoun@uttyler.edu
Board of Regents Contact- bor@utsystem.edu
Feature Image: "Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr
Comments
Post a Comment