Skip to main content

Editorial: Student Enrollment Claims Unfounded

 

(Source: James Hescock)

On Sept. 11, the University of Texas at Tyler claimed credit for the institution's historic student enrollment growth in a press release titled “UT Tyler Celebrates Largest Enrollment in Institutional History.” However, this publication found these claims to be unfounded given that the University is not even measuring the causes behind student enrollment.

In the Sept. 11 press release, UT-Tyler President Julie V. Philley, M.D. responded to the news of historic enrollment and credited the institution and its efforts for making the historic growth happen. She said, “I want to thank our admissions team, faculty and staff for their dedication to supporting our students, as well as our recruitment and retention initiatives.” 

However, according to a Texas Public Information Act (TPIA) response this publication received on Sept. 17, the University returned no documents that measured why students choose to enroll at UT-Tyler. In other words, when the publication asked for surveys or measurements that the University has used to measure why students choose to enroll at UT-Tyler, the institution responded with no document, meaning the University did not measure why students choose UT-Tyler for the fall semester.

Therefore, without a proper evaluation of the enrollment data, then how can Dr. Philley know what caused the new enrollment? For instance, while the University sought to increase its enrollment through recruitment efforts, why isn’t enrollment due to the state’s population growth or to Gen Z’s population size increasing the numbers instead?

The point is, without measuring a phenomena, all one can know is that the phenomena happened. That’s it. He cannot determine the causes behind—or at least, which causes were primarily responsible for the effect. It takes measurement to know why.

In light of the absence of conclusive evaluation, Patriot Weekly determines the president’s claims as unsupported by available data.

Without the support of proper measurement, Dr. Philley’s claims mislead the public about the enrollment data and now raise legitimate questions about competence within the University’s management. It also raises legitimate questions about leadership’s ethical commitments.

For instance, will leadership follow the data in its oversight of a significant public institution or will it pursue its own preferences as it follows a biased interpretation favorable to both itself and its institution? These are legitimate questions of competence that rise in the light of this misinterpretation.

On another note, Dr. Philley crediting the University’s efforts without proper support appears to be a reminder to students about the competing interests that exist within the university community, namely that each entity within the University seeks to justify itself as worthy of funding. This biases administrators towards a narrative of success. The University is a realm of education, but also of public relations, which means politics. Students should be aware.

The University’s claim of credit in the absence of empirical data is a reminder to students of how important it is that they think critically about the information they receive in this environment, even information from leadership. Such is the task of students who wish to maintain control over their own future.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list.  Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...
Post a Comment
Read more

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

  ("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers.   Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...
Post a Comment
Read more