Advocacy: Why Policy Matters

In our discussion about campus advocacy, campus advocates must first know that while university authorities may sometimes rule by a direct vote, the predominant way they rule is by policy.

Policy Defined

The GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English defines policy as "The method by which any institution is administered.” Method is a good synonym for policy. So in other words, policy is the established method, rule or practice that achieves the best results for the institution’s goals. This is what we mean by policy.

In higher education, the predominate way authorities rule the institution is through policy, which is a defined, specific method of handling certain affairs. For example, the policy or method of approach to students’ right to free expression, or the policy or method of approach to motorized vehicles on campus sidewalks. Higher education governance’s use of policy is pervasive.

To understand the higher education environment then, every advocate must understand the following:

1) that Board of Regents governs UT System (including subordinate UT System universities), and

2) it does so, primarily through policy.

So, while the Board may have many executors who carry out its wishes (such as administrators and staff members), its method of approach, or its policy, is how it governs UT System. The Board of Regents governs UT System by policy. This is essential to realize.

Now, in practical terms, the subject of campus regulation becomes immediately important because when an advocate does anything—when he walks to class, distributes literature, speaks in a student government forum—he then is subject to school policy. In other words, no matter where he is on school grounds, school policy always governs his behavior.

Given policy’s pervasive influence, then it is imperative to learn the institution’s policy because of its immediate influence upon the campus advocate. For as soon as he enters the campus community, then he is subject to school policy.

Therefore, campus policy is pervasive, and being such, it is critical that the advocate understand it given its influence on his advocacy operations.

Every advocate must know and understand campus policy. It is the way UT System governs itself and its institutions.

Comments

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

(Source: "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values. Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism. In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work. An effe...

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list. Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers. Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...

Patriot Weekly

Search This Blog