Skip to main content

Editorial 2: Student Body President’s Challenge

 

 

("Lecturn view"  by David Morris via Flickr)

A student body president receives much fanfare from both the administrative and faculty constituencies throughout their tenure. For example, each week, the student president meets with the staff senate president, the faculty senate president, and yes, even the university president! This is significant access for a someone who has not yet even started their career. 

Moreover, the benefits of participating in the staff and faculty communities are enormous. For example, the student body president gets their name in the bi-annual UT-Tyler magazine, typically with a feature article, and this magazine goes out to UT-Tyler alumni, businesses and other local recipients across the region. This is tremendous exposure for a young person looking to start their career, especially if they are searching for a job, an appointment to a research program, or to some other important position.

For a student body president, the benefits of going along with the staff and faculty constituencies are tremendous. 

However, it is the student voters who put the student body president in their position. The  president is in that role to represent the student body, not staff or faculty.

The challenge for the current student body president is the same for every other: will they remain true to their voters or will they discard them for personal gain?

The current student body president, Ms. Allison Schwartz, will have to remember that this temptation will always be there as she journeys through the role of president this year.

The student body president’s responsibility first lies with the student community. While the student body president must participate with faculty and staff to successfully represent students, to truly be successful in her role, the president must also stand apart from  these communities, so that she may speak freely on her constituency’s behalf without conflicts of interest to her personal ties to other constituencies or to her personal benefit.

When the student body president can be independent, then she can truly be free and be successful in a way that she could not be had she simply relied upon the approval of faculty and staff.

Only when she is independent will she be able to pursue her own vision and champion her own (student) constituency. This will be to the fanfare of her own community, and with the respect of faculty and staff.

 Feature image: "Lecturn view" by David Morris via Flickr

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...

Student Government Election This Week

    (Logo. Source: Student Government Association at UT-Tyler.) The Student Government Association (SGA) at UT-Tyler will conduct its fall senatorial elections this week, from Wednesday, September 18 at midnight to Friday, September 20 at 5 p.m. Students can vote via a link student government sent to all students Wednesday via their patriot email. Voting closes Friday at 5 p.m. While two senate constituencies are already filled (College of Arts & Sciences and College of Nursing), many others have open seats and are available for write-in candidates. Candidates for Liberty Landing senator are: Ally Barnes, Mishelle Tessy George, Vivek Kiran Ballakur. Liberty Landing has two (2) open positions in the student senate. Victory Village has two (2) open senate positions but no candidates. Freshman class senator candidates are: Adaylia Krispli, Ally Barnes, Daisy Ontiveros, Hayden Allen Cobern, Kaela Young and Nicole Stefanski. Freshman class has two (2) open senate posi...

Editorial: Introduction to The Shared Governance Model

  (''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr) In my previous articles, I gave a broad overview the university’s governance system and recently introduced the three main stakeholder groups within the university environment: faculty, students and staff. I wrote before about how a student who understands the university governance environment can participate in it to his own benefit.  To understand how these stakeholder groups interact together, let us now discuss The Shared Governance Model of higher education.      The Shared Governance Model (or “shared governance”) is a philosophy of university governance in which the university’s governing board (in our case, The Board of Regents) heavily relies upon the advice and counsel of the three stakeholder groups to govern the university. In shared governance, the board gives each group (or constituency) authority to advise the board on matters of the constituency’s expertise.  For ex...