Skip to main content

Editorial 2: Student Body President’s Challenge

 

 

("Lecturn view"  by David Morris via Flickr)

A student body president receives much fanfare from both the administrative and faculty constituencies throughout their tenure. For example, each week, the student president meets with the staff senate president, the faculty senate president, and yes, even the university president! This is significant access for a someone who has not yet even started their career. 

Moreover, the benefits of participating in the staff and faculty communities are enormous. For example, the student body president gets their name in the bi-annual UT-Tyler magazine, typically with a feature article, and this magazine goes out to UT-Tyler alumni, businesses and other local recipients across the region. This is tremendous exposure for a young person looking to start their career, especially if they are searching for a job, an appointment to a research program, or to some other important position.

For a student body president, the benefits of going along with the staff and faculty constituencies are tremendous. 

However, it is the student voters who put the student body president in their position. The  president is in that role to represent the student body, not staff or faculty.

The challenge for the current student body president is the same for every other: will they remain true to their voters or will they discard them for personal gain?

The current student body president, Ms. Allison Schwartz, will have to remember that this temptation will always be there as she journeys through the role of president this year.

The student body president’s responsibility first lies with the student community. While the student body president must participate with faculty and staff to successfully represent students, to truly be successful in her role, the president must also stand apart from  these communities, so that she may speak freely on her constituency’s behalf without conflicts of interest to her personal ties to other constituencies or to her personal benefit.

When the student body president can be independent, then she can truly be free and be successful in a way that she could not be had she simply relied upon the approval of faculty and staff.

Only when she is independent will she be able to pursue her own vision and champion her own (student) constituency. This will be to the fanfare of her own community, and with the respect of faculty and staff.

 Feature image: "Lecturn view" by David Morris via Flickr

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list.  Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

  ("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers.   Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...