Skip to main content

Editorial: To Start Practicing Advocacy, First Find A Cause

 

(Source: via Flickr)

In my previous two editorials, I shared a story about Molly, a fictional undergraduate student who used her advocacy power as a student to obtain a policy change at the university with student government's help. 

In my subsequent editorial, I explained the different story elements that outline how the policy change process works. These insights were the fact that policy change requires a negotiation between two or more parties, and that students, while influential stakeholders, share the university with other interests and with interest groups, such as the staff and faculty. I also noted that all parties in the negotiation—both student and non-students—have a “political agenda” or rather a list of priorities that they are trying to serve and how it is important to discern this list for success in a policy change effort. Finally, I also noted how that student government's involvement is usually imperative for successful policy reform since the government can leverage its privileged access with The Board of Regents to overcome administrative opposition. These are important insights for successful policy reform.

Now, in this article, I would like to share how it is important for every advocate, no matter how skilled, to have a most important element in his advocacy, one that enables him to do any advocacy at all. that is, he must have a cause.

So what is a cause? A cause animates a person’s advocacy. It gives him something to fight for. For instance, one may fight for wetland preservation or for child literacy in his local community. He may champion military service to his country or success for a new hometown restaurant. These are examples of causes that one might fight for. They are beliefs and values that one holds that animate a person’s advocacy. Without theses, there is no one to write to, and nothing to talk about. There are no speeches to give and no campaigns to run, for all these things require a purpose. Without a cause, there is no purpose to advocacy, but with a cause, one has purpose to his advocacy. 

Now, it is important to note that a cause constitutes personal values that one stands for, and these values drive one’s behavior. For instance, one may cherish belonging and acceptance, so he values family and community. As a result, he is a big proponent of practices like eating dinner together and family movie night. Another person may love resourcefulness and security, so he values financial knowledge and employer matching 401(k) contributions for employees. These are examples of how a cause reflects one’s values and how these values are the driving force behind advocate's behavior.  

So advocacy is about beliefs and by extension, about these beliefs' application through ethics, which manifest in a particular cause (whatever cause that is; whether it is conservationism, education, or etc.)

In short, without a cause, an advocate has nothing to fight for. If one wishes to be a successful advocate, either for himself or on someone else’s behalf, then he must champion a cause or else his advocacy is empty and he will have nothing to fight for.

So while we discuss tactics such as letter writing or running campaigns, behind these actions must be service to a cause or else these mechanics are meaningless and futile.

So if one doesn’t know where to begin in his efforts at advocacy, then he should first find a cause to champion and start there.

Feature Image: Via Flickr. (Source unknown!)

*Editor's Note: Updated on September 15, 2025 at 10:24 A.M. for flow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...

Student Government Election This Week

    (Logo. Source: Student Government Association at UT-Tyler.) The Student Government Association (SGA) at UT-Tyler will conduct its fall senatorial elections this week, from Wednesday, September 18 at midnight to Friday, September 20 at 5 p.m. Students can vote via a link student government sent to all students Wednesday via their patriot email. Voting closes Friday at 5 p.m. While two senate constituencies are already filled (College of Arts & Sciences and College of Nursing), many others have open seats and are available for write-in candidates. Candidates for Liberty Landing senator are: Ally Barnes, Mishelle Tessy George, Vivek Kiran Ballakur. Liberty Landing has two (2) open positions in the student senate. Victory Village has two (2) open senate positions but no candidates. Freshman class senator candidates are: Adaylia Krispli, Ally Barnes, Daisy Ontiveros, Hayden Allen Cobern, Kaela Young and Nicole Stefanski. Freshman class has two (2) open senate posi...

Editorial: Introduction to The Shared Governance Model

  (''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr) In my previous articles, I gave a broad overview the university’s governance system and recently introduced the three main stakeholder groups within the university environment: faculty, students and staff. I wrote before about how a student who understands the university governance environment can participate in it to his own benefit.  To understand how these stakeholder groups interact together, let us now discuss The Shared Governance Model of higher education.      The Shared Governance Model (or “shared governance”) is a philosophy of university governance in which the university’s governing board (in our case, The Board of Regents) heavily relies upon the advice and counsel of the three stakeholder groups to govern the university. In shared governance, the board gives each group (or constituency) authority to advise the board on matters of the constituency’s expertise.  For ex...