Skip to main content

Editorial: Introduction To Stakeholder Groups In University Governance

 

(Photo: ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr)

In my previous article, I gave an introductory overview of what a student needs to know to have an introductory understanding of university governance, and how this is important because this understanding will allow him to know how to participate in university decision-making about his own affairs while at university. 

In this article, I will introduce the main players (or stakeholders) in university governance and this will allow the reader to begin his understanding of the university's internal governance system. In this essay, I will introduce the university's governing board, the three constituencies and their governments and finally the university president and their roles. If a student has a basic understanding of these, then he can begin his introductory understanding of the university environment and ultimately, the way to advocate for his concerns in the university environment. 

So, let us begin. 

Within the higher education governance system, there is a governing board of trustees or “regents” which oversees all university activity. It has nine members who are appointees by the state governor and confirmed by the state senate.

Advising the board are three constituencies; faculty, students and staff. These constituencies have representation at both the university- and university system-levels. In this article, we will focus on their representation at the university-level.

At the university-level, these constituencies have representation through the faculty senate, student government association and the staff senate. All three representatives are appointed and acknowledged by the board to advise the board on their community’s behalf. 

For instance, the faculty senate represents the faculty to the governing board, the student government association represents the student body to the governing board and the staff senate (or staff advisory council) represents the university’s operational staff to the governing board. 

These three constituencies bear authority from the board to represent their community’s interests to the governing board. This authority means their representation is exclusive, meaning, in the board’s eyes, these alone speak for their communities. 

Aside from authority from the governing board, these entities also have authority from the community itself. It is to represent their community’s interests back to the community itself. This aspect refers back to our introductory article’s mention of how the governing body’s authority extends both to the community’s external and internal affairs. 

For instance, the governing body will determine rules for community elections, parliamentary procedures, and it administers the elections themselves. These internal matters the governing body handles on the community's behalf. These are what we might consider internal affairs. 

However, for the community's external affairs, the government will speak on the community’s behalf in matters of collective university concern, meaning, those priorities which lie outside the community's sole jurisdiction, and especially those decisions that affect the collective university community as a whole. For example, decisions such as the selection of a new university president or plans to demolish campus green space for new parking lots, or any other university affair that affects the community and its concerns. These governing bodies represent their community’s interests in internal university, yet external community affairs.  

These are the basic roles of the three main governing bodies at a university: advising the governing board, regulating its community and representing the community's interest within internal university affairs. 

Finally, the university president represents the governing board at the local level. In other words, the president is the board’s representative. He reports to the board and makes or carries out decisions on the board’s behalf. He is the face of the Board to both the university and to the surrounding local community. The president is the board's representative at the local, university level.

The governing board, the three governing bodies and the university president: these are the three main players or stakeholder groups within the university’s internal governance environment.

If a student knows these, then he will have a better understanding of how to participate in university governance.
 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list.  Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

  ("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers.   Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...