Skip to main content

Editorial: Five Insights For Successful Policy Reform

(Source: DS Bigham via Flickr)

In my last article, I illustrated how policy change happens within a university due to student advocacy. I told the story of how Molly, a fictional undergraduate student, wanted the University to adopt a policy change and I illustrated the steps she had to take to realize the change. I also illustrated some obstacles she might encounter in the process. 

Through the story, the reader should note five insights about student advocacy and the policy change process:

First, a student advocate’s voice is only so strong by itself. Molly engaged in direct advocacy with an administrator, which can sometimes work, but she was unsuccessful until she won student government’s support. An advocate’s voice by itself is only so strong. 

Second, each person in the governance environment has what we will call a “political agenda”. This is not a bad word, but each person has a set of priorities he must serve, usually a list of responsibilities that demand his immediate attention. Molly did not succeed at getting Director Smith’s support for her red-blue trash separation policy at first because it did not serve Smith’s agenda (his list of priorities). It is important to realize that each person has a political agenda, a set of priorities that demand his attention. 

Third, the way to win another party’s support is by either changing or serving his political agenda. For example, when student government successfully lobbied senior leadership to adopt Molly’s red-blue separation policy, the Board instructed the University to adopt the policy. This directive from senior leadership changed Director Smith’s political agenda. He now had to follow leadership’s instruction, which meant he had to implement Molly’s policy. It changed his political agenda. The way to win a counterpart’s support is either by changing or serving his political agenda. 

Fourth, getting student government to adopt one’s cause is the most effective way to achieve a policy change. Student government leverages its access to The UT-System Board of Regents, the university’s governing board, to support student causes. This is what happened for Molly. SGA successfully championed Molly’s red-blue trash separation with the governing board. This led to the Board’s support and to the policy change. Student government can offer leverage for one’s cause and its support is the most effective way to achieve policy outcomes given its favored status with senior university leadership.

Finally, policy change across constituencies is a negotiation. While students get a say in university policy, they do not always get what they want. There are other interests, such as administrative and faculty considerations, at play. Knowing what is on the other party’s agenda (priority list) is an important part of making a mutually beneficial arrangement. This is because while both student government and individual student advocates have power, all efforts at policy change are a negotiation. 

These five insights can help any student advocate understand the advocacy process. A single student’s voice is only so strong by itself, everyone has an agenda (a set of priorities), changing or serving their priorities is the key to winning cooperation, student government’s support is often paramount to achieving a policy change and finally, winning a policy change is a negotiation. These insights can help any student advocate be as successful as Molly in their advocacy goals. 

Feature Image:  DS Bigham via Flickr
 
*Editor's Note: Updated at 10:08 A.M. on September 15, 2025 for flow.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list.  Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

  ("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers.   Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...