Skip to main content

Editorial: Intercollegiate Athletics: An Existential Threat To Public Higher Education

("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr)

In my research into the spring 2024 athletics fee referendum, I simultaneously did a lot of research into the UT-Tyler’s athletics program. For example, I found that as far back as Fiscal Year 2015 (FY15), UT-Tyler’s athletics program used money from the recreational facility (a facility whose funding comes from a separate student fee, The Recreational Facility Fee) to pay for its coaches’ partial salaries.

For example, in FY18, the Head Tennis Coach received roughly $21,000 from the recreational facility’s operating budget, along with the Head Women's Volleyball Coach who received roughly $20,000.

Now, the problem with this is that the athletics program already has its Intercollegiate Athletics Fee. This fee represents its own allotment of student money and the funds students pay for it to run its operation. Yet here, in the recreational facility budget, I found athletics relied upon money from yet another student fee, and all this, to fund the Athletics Machine.

Athletics’ imposition on another student priority (recreation activity) illustrates the authoritarian nature of sports entertainment. Like a fire, it never has enough.

Athletics’ imposition will not stop until it subordinates other missions as well, including the state’s mission of education.

Texas must get intercollegiate athletics out of higher education to preserve public education.

@jhescock12

Feature image: "Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list.  Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

  ("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers.   Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...