Skip to main content

Students Approve Athletics Fee Increase

 (Logo. Source: Student Government Association at UT-Tyler.)

UT-Tyler students approved a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee last week 53.04% to 46.96%, with a voter turnout of 937 voters. The referendum saw the second largest turnout for a student election in nearly a decade, coming just shy of fall 2021’s student election of 1,106, which was over a previous athletics fee increase proposal.

Neither Vice President for Athletics Howard Patterson nor Student Body President Chloe Dix responded to requests for comment by the time of this article’s publication. Dix’s association, student government, facilitated the election.

According to the proposal, students’ maximum semester payment for the Intercollegiate Athletics Fee will now increase by $90 and install in roughly $30 increments over the next three years. Minimum semester payments will also go up, from $96 now to $132 in fall 2026.

The athletics department ran in favor of a fee increase on the basis that the program provides national awareness to the University to prospective students and donors. It also touted athletics’ contributions to school spirit and student engagement, among other benefits. Unique to this fee increase was its claim that the fee increase’s passage would reduce the University’s spending on athletics and therefore "free-up" funding for other student organizations.

Patriot Weekly ran editorials critical of these claims in the weeks leading up to the referendum. It said that students did not need to pass a fee increase to gain more money for extracurriculars and that students were not responsible for the University’s risky NCAA Division II transition which lead to greater athletics expenses. It claimed this transfer of responsibility was what the fee proposal was about.

With 497 students who voted to approve the fee increase and 440 voted against it, the referendum passed by 57  votes.

Student athlete and men’s basketball player Mate Kapanadze said he was happy to hear the results. "I am happy that it will increase," he said.

Kapanadze said he voted in favor of the increase to promote the University. "I think for a lot of people to know about this university, athletics has to be better. So if we didn’t have money to help...it would be tough for us to compete on a high level because other DII colleges have more money than us. So I feel that would help us." 

Kapanadze is an international student from the country Georgia and said he pays for college through a scholarship.

Freshman Payton Wendt said she voted against the increase. "I said no to the referendum because I didn’t want to have to pay more for something that I’m not participating in just because I don’t go to the games or anything like that. So, I thought, Why would I have to pay when I’m not participating in it?"

As for how she feels now that the increase passed, Wendt said, "Well, majority rules, I guess. I’ll just have to pay the extra that they said."

Wendt said, “Right now, I’m able to go to college strictly on an [academic] scholarship. I’m not sure how I’m going to pay for my next semesters honestly but I’m on my own to figure it out." Wendt is a civil engineering major.

Another freshman engineering major remarked that he did not vote because he did not feel his vote would make a difference amidst so many other students in the student body.

Freshman Omar Espiricueta said he did not vote because he did not know about the fee election.

However, after hearing how only around 900 students out of roughly 9,500 voted, both said they would have voted if they had known about the low turnout.

Send reader comments to hescockjames01 at g mail  dot com

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Editorial: Three Types of Campus Activism Work

  (Source:  "Justin Whelan" by Kate Ausburn via Flickr ) Within the university context, there are three communities: students, faculty and staff. However, once one has a basic understanding of how these communities work together to govern the university (a.k.a., the "shared governance" model), then one can still find it difficult to identify how one can participate in shaping the university to reflect his values.  Therefore, this article will introduce three types of activism work that I have noticed in my years observing campus activity. I hope these types will illuminate a path for the reader of greater participation within his campus community and towards influencing the institution for his values. So without further adieu, let us introduce the three basic forms of campus activism.  In my observation of campus advocacy over the years, I have noticed three types of campus activism: compliance work, legislative work and public education work.  An effe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Editorial: An Introduction To University Governance

( Photo : ''Court Gavel - Judge's Gavel - Courtroom'' by wp paarz via Flickr ) In my previous articles, we spoke of our fictional heroine Molly who took the proper steps to advocate for university change successfully. We used her story to illustrate how the policy change process at a university works. Afterwards in the next article, we analyzed how her story illustrated important elements in the policy change process, such as how every stakeholder has a priority list and how a successful advocate will know how to either appeal to or influence this list.  Most recently, we noted how even with all the tactics in the world, it is a cause that gives one’s advocacy meaning. Now in this article, we will explore the university’s internal governance system, which is the context in which a student’s advocacy occurs. At the end of this article, the reader should have a better grasp of the advocacy environment within higher education. Metaphorically speaking, the reader will...
Post a Comment
Read more

Editorial: Understanding The Athletics Fee Increase Referendum

  ("Money - Savings" by 401(K) - 2012 via Flickr) What is the student vote happening from March 20 to March 22? There is a proposal to increase the mandatory Intercollegiate Athletics Fee on the student ballot for the March 20 to March 22 spring 2024 election. There is also an election for student government executive officers.   Why is the athletics program seeking a fee increase? The athletics program is asking the student body to take financial responsibility for its unexpected NCAA Division II expenses after it transitioned to NCAA Division II at the University’s direction without the available funds in 2018. The proposed fee increase is to transfer the financial responsibility to students so the University can spend its current $2.4 million annual subsidy to the athletics program on other priorities. ( Patriot Weekly’s summary.) Why did the athletics program transition to NCAA Division II without a financial plan? Allegedly, the decision to transition the program fro...
Post a Comment
Read more